Sixt
44 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Augsburg 1
03.04.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 2
03.07.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 3
24.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 4
28.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 5
15.12.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 6
11.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
02.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
11.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
18.09.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
11.06.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
26.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
14.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Germany 13
22.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
02.09.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 15
28.01.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 16
12.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 17
30.05.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 18
25.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 19
09.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 20
15.08.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
18.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
29.05.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 23
05.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Leipzig 24
16.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Munich 25
07.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 26
24.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 27
13.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 28
27.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 29
24.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Münster 30
09.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Nuremberg 31
08.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Pullach 32
27.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Pullach 33
19.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Pullach 34
19.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Pullach 35
06.01.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Useful management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Pullach 36
11.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Pullach 37
24.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Pullach 38
08.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Pullach 39
05.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Pullach 40
16.09.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Rostock 41
24.11.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Rostock 42
08.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Rostock 43
10.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Stuttgart 44
03.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
